A careful index of published court decisions, regulator records and government documents connected to Couran Cove. Read the original source before reaching a conclusion.
Items below are linked to the publisher’s original public source where available. A court filing is not described as a judgment; a media report is not treated as a court finding; and a government response is not attributed to an agency beyond what it says.
This index is being expanded. It does not claim to contain every case, event, document or party connected with Couran Cove.
Confidence: primary source. Neutral citations and proceeding numbers are provided where available.
Procedural orders extending time for the Community Body Corporate to comply with an earlier order. This was not a substantive determination of the underlying levy or utility dispute.
Read the published decision ↗Published judgment concerning the 14 December 2021 annual general meeting and voting eligibility. Read the reasons and orders for the Court’s precise findings.
Read the published decision ↗The Court granted summary judgment to the Community Body Corporate for 2024 levy claims against the listed proprietors. Costs were to be dealt with separately.
Read the published decision ↗Published decision in the receivership proceedings. Its orders were later considered on appeal in [2026] QCA 133.
Read the published decision ↗Published decision concerning an application in the dispute. The original judgment is the source for the precise orders and reasons.
Read the published decision ↗Appeal allowed concerning priority of specified money recovered under costs orders. The Court set aside one paragraph of the Supreme Court order and made replacement directions.
Read the published decision ↗These records identify documented roles and statements. They should not be used to infer an unrecorded finding.
The Australian Energy Regulator register records a current retail exemption. The published conditions were varied on 4 September 2023.
Open original record ↗A petition records its petitioners’ request. It is not a court finding or a determination of liability.
Open original record ↗The response states that the Queensland Government could not direct the City of Gold Coast to provide water and sewer infrastructure under the Local Government Act 2009.
Open original record ↗The response describes support measures and states that the Government would not directly intervene in private disputes or court cases.
Open original record ↗The response refers to ongoing proceedings and regular assessments involving Queensland Health, DETSI and the City of Gold Coast. It does not itself determine responsibility or wrongdoing.
Open original record ↗This page does not publish personal profiles, contact information or unverified claims. Where a person is named in a source, readers should rely on the exact source and its context.
An Australian Energy Regulator submission dated 31 July 2020 is signed in the capacity identified in that submission. It is a source-specific record, not a general profile.
Read AER submission ↗[2024] QSC 172 records evidence from a representative of the utility suppliers. Media descriptions are kept separate from judicial findings.
Read judgment ↗These reports may identify leads or explain public concern. They are not independently presented here as evidence of a legal outcome.
iHave a public, authoritative source that is missing? Send the exact URL, document title or neutral citation to ops@southstradbroke.co. Do not send confidential records, private contact details or unverified allegations.
Use the notice board to suggest a public question that can be answered with a source—not to submit accusations or private disputes.
Open community notice board →